Monday, 27 March 2017

Russian money

Russia is rich, and she will fund experiments on siting steam plasma tubes to warm and wet Siberia – sucking all that lovely CO2 from the air. They produce oil and gas – meaning more global life.


Jonathan Thomason said...

No man-made Climate Change
2 years ago carbon emissions fell by 4.5%. last year they fell by 6%. But photosynthesis converts extra carbon into biomass WITHIN 5 MINUTES.
1 mCO2+(n+r)H2O+TU-> +r(He+O+E2+X-ray)
r(He+O+E2+X-ray)=biological Molecular Nuclear Fusion
I was back in Sheffield last year, and told my PhD (Chemical and process engineering) about Molecular Nuclear Fusion – and he expressed ignorance.
Of the single most important energy system on Earth: what is he teaching his students?
No doubt that carbon emission increased CO2 levels in the global air. They don't – photosynthesis on the land and sea converts extra carbon back into active life – as I told him 2001.
All academics who have ever published work on Global Warming, should not be in science. And certainly not in education.
The most useful form of Molecular Nuclear Fusion is plasma Molecular Nuclear Fusion. As done by every lightening strike – every 3 minutes around the Earth. Providing 1040W of energy to drive nature.
Venting steam does Molecular Nuclear Fusion – and drives all earthquakes and volcanoes: which is why both give off X-rays. Academics were not interested in man-made Climate Change last time I looked.
So every lightening bolt is a 1.5kn 2cm wide steam plasma which releases 2.5x1030W, as it produces 5 tonnes of helium gas.
A 50x1cm steam plasma at 4 atmospheres releases a constant 1.2MW of heat.
2 H2O+TU->He2++O2++4e-+E2+X-ray Molecular Nuclear Fusion
but in a glass tube, we do the twice as dynamic H fission
3 H2O+TU->E22+L=X-ray E22=2.4MW from a 50x1cm steam plasma
to explain
4 H++e- ->n0 the plasma turns hydrogens and free electrons into neutrons
3 16O2++4n0 ->6n0+2H+ oxygen becomes neutrons and hydrogen ions
5 H++r n0->Er3+L+X-ray hence 3
So we have a glass tube, filled with steam from a paint stripper to 4 atmospheres. We borrow the electronics from a fluorescent light, and fire us the plasma, We use an air blast to cool the tube – we didn't in 2001 and melted the tube. Hence we stopped doing work on H fission.
If we had set it in a sealed water take, we would have got 2.4MW of steam at 350oC – after a significant vent. We would have been better off halving the tube, and using the second piece to superheat the steam to 920oC.
A $400-1,500 steam turbine (Steam Turbines - WADE : World Alliance for Decentralized Energy) would have generated over 1MW of carbon 0, non polluting, Fossil Fuels free power.
Generating an annual income of $3 billion. Payback 0.0036 seconds. No running cost. No CO2 – but CO2 levels fell by 4.5% 2 years ago. 6% last year.
As people go over to Molecular Nuclear Fusion, and H fission. No large plant required. The major cost is the turbine. So we are talking about $4,000.
Talk to your back manager – or even get it on VISA: you will pay back on your next bill – before you fly off to the Bahamas – for life.
So no 18 billion, for a super toxic uranium nuclear plant: which is so dangerous it needs insurance of 100 billion annually. 25 times more than the profit of the plant. So nuclear power really costs 51p per kW hour. Conventional power 8p. H fission 0.0002p.
And that is why carbon emissions are crashing. It is 1950s science. And all those academics should be sacked, and pay back all salary since 1984 – the year of Chernobyl – as they are acting as nuclear stooges.
I told Sheffield this in 2001 – they ended my PhD with no award. The students I would have got them. First video on Molecular Nuclear Fusion

Jonathan Thomason said...

CO2 down 6%
So carbon emissions have fallen by 6%. Global CO2 levels are caped by photosynthesis. So more CO2 means more active life – not more CO2 in the air.
So the present CO2 global level is only 2 parts per million – its pre-industrial level. And emission have crashed, as people stop burning Fossil Fuels.
Because people are using steam plasma tubes to do Molecular Nuclear Fusion
1 H2O+TU->He+O+E2+X-ray
1.2MW from a 50x1cm steam plasma tube at 4 atmospheres. A thermoelectric generator will turn into 72kW of carbon 0 electricity. Carbon 0.
So I am waiting for just 1 of the 150,000 people who earn their living to explain to me, why the Paris accord is not the most stupid international treaty ever.
The want to restrict economic activity, so Global Warming will raise the global temperature by less than 2oC in the next 20 years. After the world has been cooling naturally for 21 years.
For at least 2 years, CO2 levels ARE FALLING NATURALLY. As people do carbon free power generation. 10-12cc of regular water running a 100MW power station for a year. We YouTube video on Molecular Nuclear Fusion has amassed 13,000 hits in the last 8 years.
So carbon gets turned into life – fewer Fossil Fuels being burned will restrict plant growth. It does not warm the air. CO2 goes up in a natural ice-age. 4 year time delay.
You want to raise CO2 levels – organise an ice-age. Or shut the hell up. So all the copy on Global Warming – free adverts for nuclear power. Who need insurance of 100 billion per plant. They do not have.
ALL nuclear power illegal. Nuclear powers owes the world media 10s of billion for all those free adverts. Last year, CO2 fell by only 4.5%: FELL! Before Paris met.
I FaceBooked Hillary Clinton direct, but she was too busy shredding emails. Or she ddin't get back to me.