For 3.8 billion years, heavy rain (and snow) hs done nuclear fusion on Earth
This has set up lightening
There is no chemical source of X-rays and light, and the only nuclear process is Molecular Nuclear Fusion: I thought of this idea in 2001 at Sheffeild University – and they ended my PhD into energy in a hurry!
Google 'Sheffield University', and tel lthem what you think about being denied safe, clean and free nuclear fusion. That is 64 times as energetic as hyper toxic nuclear fission from uranium.
A 1m row of oil or gas burners releases just 45kW. A 1mx2cm steam plasma at 4 atmospheres releases 16.4MW of heat.
The plasma tube has to sit in a water bath, or even silica glass would vaporise.
So a 50x1cm glass tube at 4 atmospheres releases 2.4MW of heat. A huge number. We will generate over ½MW of free, clean, non toxic electricity.
The national gris will pay us 150 million UK pounds a year. We will power 50 households – from a plant in the garage.
What I needed was to meet an engineer from Parson's – who make steam turbines. His name is Bradley – and I say in the new year with him.
So I was getting ready to do a medical PhD with Cambridge University – this will now have t obe a distance PhD, so I can year a wage, as I save life on Earth.
Generatin g power for 0.02p per kW hour. Nuclear power charges 2p per kWhr. If we Ti plate a boiler room boiler plate, the Face Centred Cubic Molecular Nuclear Fusion will allow conventional plants to geenrate power at 4p per kW hour: with no hyper toxic radioactive waste to handle.
Which will end up costing uranium nuclear power 236 UK p – 118 times the cost of the generated power: this is a bankrupt, hyper toxic industry.
That requires 100 billion of insurance per plant: they carry 50 million. They are totally illegal, and the governement lawyers MUST shut the industry down – in 1984. Why has it never been done? Folding green paper of couse.
So for a conventional power plant, we repace the cooling toware with a giant helical turbulence heat exchanger. Read http://www.ijsr.net/archive/v4i8/SUB157502.pdf
This will reduce the cost of conventional power to 2p per kW hour – with no radioactive waste to cope with.
And then we replace the Fossil Fuels rods with steam plasma tubes – and the cost shrinks to 0.002 per kW hour.
Is anybody out there thinking oil and gas are massively over priced? We borrow the electrics from a fluorescent light, and fire up the tube – sat in water. Once started it runs unpower. Using 7x10-14cc of regular water a year.
And 9 of them will generate 100MW. So mains power is just about to get 100 times cheaper.
And Uranium nuclear power will al lshut down. Which leaveds us with a toxic legacy to cope with. There is a way. Half fill a tube with fisison waste, and then steam. Fire up a steam plasma, and the radioactive waste gets eaten: all expenses covered by the then owners of nuclear power: who will of course go horribly bankrupt.