National governments will give unlimited research money for nuclear fusion that actually works. I told Sheffield University that steam engines do Molecular Nuclear Fusion in 2001 – btu my supervisor was funded by nuclear power – so edned my PhD for no reason 2001.
The simplest way to do Molecular Nuclear Fusion is via a steam plasma.
1 H++e- ->n0 hydrogen ions and free eelctrons bond to form neutrons.
2 16O2++4n0+E ->8H++6e- the neutrons wil lcause the oxygen ions to fission into hydrogens. This takes in energy
3 H++2 n0 ->E23+L+X-ray 4 neutrons will cause a hydrogen ion t ofission into massive, carbon 0 energy.
So a 50x1cm steam plasma at 4 atmopheres will self sustain – once started. Releasing 1.2MWE or energy, from just 10-17cc of regular water a decade. Matter is such a dense form of energy.
Interestingly enough, a Fossil Fuels flame forms a steam plasma. Oxidising the carbon radical takes in energy.
But the plasma releases He gas, and X-rays – and the nuclear fusion makes the flame very exothermic.
In 1982 I learned oxidisng carbon without a flame – takes in heat. AS we do no nuclear fusion.
Clean, carbon 0 power. Uranium fission needs insurance cover of 100 billion. When we fired up a steam plasma, we couls either reduce the gas pressure, or tap the glass tue with a little hammer to stop the nuclear fusion: so no insurance cover.
My 50x1cm steam plasma tube will prodcue an annual income of 3.6 million a year in the UK: as electricity is so over priced. It cost 0.0001p per kW day. Nuclear power loses money at 2p per kW hour.
It only seems to make money, while they do not reprocess their hyper toxic radioactive waste. And no fracking ever. We use the electronics from a fluorescent light, a glass tube, and very little water, to get unlimited free energy