As taught to me at Sheffield University in the 1980s, burning Fossil Fuels produces X-rays – as it does Molecular Nuclear Fusion
As taught to me in high school biology, plants on the land and seas greasily gabble up CO2 – to form biomass
So the formation of carbohydrates is endothermic, and is accompanied by He production and X-ray – as the plant doe Molecular Nuclear Fusion.
Animals also do Molecular Nuclear Fusion
Which makes biology the discipline with most to say about nuclear fusion. Physics can't do it! Hint, give the circulating H ions spin
So a fusion torous magically does nuclear fusion! Thanks prof Z – good idea. Just 1 W of turbulence does the trick: nuclear fusion is SO easy. Physics PhDers have taken the money and run. It really is not hard.
So there is no possibility of an increase of CO2 in the global air – it is capped at 2 parts per million. There is 65% less active life now that in the Jurassic – due to the carbon being locked up in the Fossil Fuels.
So by burning them we are increasing life on Earth – with 5 minutes extra CO2 is extra biomass. Climate change pundits obviously have untreated mental health problems – go ask a high school biology teacher.
So a 25x1cm steam plasma generates a constant 600 kW at 4 atmospheres. We can generate 100 kW of power – a helicopter only needs 45 kW. Carbon zero power. Using 5x10-17cc of regular water a year – we will struggle to measure it.
If we Ti plate a car engine, we will double 'r' – the amount of nuclear fusion we do. More than doubling the engine power.
So halving the fuel we need to burn. Though we do halve the life enhancing CO2 we release.
So for a $200 Ti electroplate to the engine body and cylinder heads, we will halve the Fossil Fuels we burn. This will decrease petrol from 120p per litre, to jet 28p. 37 cents.
The Saudis are already losing money. They badly need to get out of the oil business.