The same power from half the fuel. Fuel price is directly linked to demand, so this will decrease fuel prices by 60%: making this weeks 14% increase in petrol prices look very stupid.
I was taught this science at Sheffield University in 1982
I was always intrigued that oxidizing carbon fuels takes in energy. It is only due to the Molecular Nuclear Fusion the cycle is exothermic. No PhD for pointing this out in 2001.
So we can increase the power, by increase the turbulence of injection. Or by increasing the fuel we put it – supercharging. Even nitrous injection increases the Molecular Nuclear Fusion we do.
A better idea is to Ti plate the inside of the engine. Best down after a cylinder rebore. To remove cylinder wear and groves.
Now we electroplate the engine. And we will double the r(He+O+X-ray+Er3) we do – 2 times the Molecular Nuclear Fusion. Double the power for the same fuel burn.
Obviously we tweak the carbonate or fuel injection system, to go on a lean burn. So the same power for half the fuel burn. This works for petrol and diesel system.
I advocate using a 25x1cm steam plasma tube. Which generates 580 kW, at 4 atmospheres. From 0.25x10-18cc of regular water a year.
No Fossil Fuels burn – no CO2: which is a shame, as CO2 is converted into plant bio-mass within 5 minutes by the photosynthesis on the land and seas.
CO2 levels are thus at a pre-industrial 2 parts per million. Man's additional 0.0004% CO2 from burning Fossil Fuels just increases active life on Earth. CO2 levels are high above the Arctuics in winter. 4Pm, and temperatures of -20oC.
Global Warming was junk science devised by the mentally retarded for nuclear power. And believed by the science stupid – so you never bought into it.
Global temperatures have been decreasing since 1995. They will start warming again in another 7 years – due to predictable solar emission cycles.
A steam plasma uses no Fossil Fuels. Very little regular water. Ti plating an existing engine will have the petrol burn. Watch prices plummet.