25 October 2014
When you burn fossil fuels you do a tiny bit of molecular nuclear fusion, but your oxidise the carbon!
Or 2 ->CO2+r(He+O3+E2+Xray
So we see that oxidising carbon is endothermic. This equation is for methane, but the same applies for petrol and diesel oil. Have fun and do the equations yourself!
So the 100 billion a year spent on the great hadron collider is such a waste!! Any lit Bunsen burner does (molecular) nuclear fusion. This is why flames generate so much heat. The turbulent steam does nuclear fusion. Oxidising methane gradually with no flame takes in heat.
As any chemist realises! Or are there any adequate the educated chemist. You learn this the the final year at high school.
So really we don’t want to burn fossil fuels. We want to be so steam in turbulent flow. Nature shows us how. Every 3 minutes around the earth heavy rain sets up a lightening strike.
The heavy rain itself does nuclear fusion:
Geographers have written papers about the production of helium, massive heat and X rays from heavy rain. I have been writing papers about this for four years. Not one physicist has ever corresponded about it.
They are not interested in nuclear fusion. They are interested in research money! The nuclear power will give them to write papers about the weather. A subject they have no training or experience and.
The Alpha particles collect above the clouds. The negative charge falls to the ground. Manmade gives out of 5000 volts A partial steam plasma who excel electoral holes from the cloud tops to the ground.
When it touches down we get the up rush of hundred amps of charge electrons. Through a partial steam plasma. This releases 2.5x1030 Watts of energy. As heat, light, sound X rays. There is no chemical source of visible light, X rays or helium.
Visible light is emitted by lightning strikes, all we see light flashes in the deep ocean currents-than also get the production of helium and free radical oxygen. As the turbulent flow of high pressure water does molecular nuclear fusion.
I did the calculations, and nuclear fusion is eight times as exothermic as hyper toxic uranium fission. It produces inert helium. Not lethal plutonium!
Even molecular nuclear fusion is still six times more exothermic than uranium fission. Which is 20 times as exothermic as fossil fuel burning. So a steam plasma is 120 times as exothermic as burning boiling gas.
Above four atmospheres the plasma self sustains well we augment the water pressure. The helium ions bond with free electrons. To form neutrons.
These bond with their other ions, causing a cascade of nuclear fission too low atomic weights. Each fission converting a neutron into free energy. This makes the nuclear fission of low atomic mass atoms exothermic.
The final nuclear fusion of the enriched hydrogen ions, results in massive heat, light and X rays.
It is sad that physicists will not engage with this science! As I am sure they can make a contribution.
So we can replace the burning of fossil fuels to boil water. We also 1 cm wide x one metre long glass tube filled with steam. This will generate, constant the heat.
A lightning bolt generates a constant 6 MW/m from a similarly pressurised 2 cm wide steam plasma. So a pure steam plasma should generate 40 MW. A one metre wide would generate a constant 12 MW/m.
A steam engine have steam in turbulent flow. And generates 3000° C in the fire tubes in the boiler. Which do not melt choose the presence of liquid water. This is 1.4 MW from a 2 metre fire tube.
I you see the problem here! 12 MW is 10 times too large. We need to do a the experiments on a 2 mm steam plasma tube.
A steam plasma most exothermic structure on earth. Eight times more heat than from the toxic uranium fission tubes.
We can easily convert all present nuclear plants to do clean molecular nuclear fusion. Rather than 200 uranium fission tubes, will 32 steam plasma tubes.
I wore a consume a thimble full of regular water each for a decade. And generate an utterly no hyper toxic solid waste. And water falls from the skies for free.
Every biological organism on earth uses molecular nuclear fusion. Your heart causes the emission of X rays from your heart and arteries as it beats. So you do molecular nuclear fusion!
It is a safer Energy System of nature. That does not need any toxic enriched fuel. That does not produce waste which remains lethal for 100,000 years.
Nuclear power never costs of the handling of its toxic used fuel rods. It does not even take account of the horrendous decommissioning costs.
Sellafield is at 20 billion pounds and rising! The costs met by the British government. A commercial power plant has to be decommissioned by the company.
Its nuclear power plant has to carry sufficient insurance. Which after Fukushima is 100,000,000,000 pounds. No commercial insurance is even a available for 1% of this!
So every nuclear plant is running with no storage capability for its waste. And totally under insured. Luckily there is a thing called the power station regulator. I met the representative in 1983.
He told me that every nuclear plant only carries Insurance of 50,000,000. Such a small proportion of the required amount. There is no storage capability for any more nuclear waste. Hasn’t been for two years.
The legal sanction an open to the regulator is to initiating immediate stop orders on every nuclear facility in Britain. Nuclear power must be shut down!
Molecular nuclear fusion is inherently safe and non polluting. To stop the plant turn up the glass tube with a hammer. As I mentioned your heart already does molecular nuclear fusion all day. It is the Energy System of biology.
Nature does not do toxic nuclear fission from enriched uranium. Neither should man. If we want to live as a species for longer than the next 10 years.
Nuclear power is nicely on track to extinguish all life on earth.
Jonathan Thomason JonThm9@aol.com